W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: mapping of QNames to URIs? (in XHTML Role module)

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:55:01 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
Message-ID: <op.tzmjlznssmjzpq@acer3010>

There is an ED with some text at
	http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml-role-20070905/#sec_3.1.1.

but there should be a newer one before the end of the week.

Steven

On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:39:26 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 15:35 +0200, Steven Pemberton wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> Thanks. This is now fixed.
>
> I'm interested to see how it's fixed. Is there an editor's
> draft or something I can look at?
>
>
>> Steven
>>
>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:25:53 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > A comment on
>> >   http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role
>> >   http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml-role-20061113
>> >
>> > Please clarify how QNames in the role attribute are mapped to URIs.
>> >
>> > Maybe it's already there and I'm just reading too fast? In any
>> > case, for motivation, the March 2004 TAG finding, which concludes...
>> >
>> > "Where there is a compelling reason to use QNames instead of URIs for
>> > identification, it is imperative that specifications provide a mapping
>> > between QNames and URIs, if such a mapping is possible."
>> >  -- Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in XML Content
>> >   TAG Finding 17 March 2004
>> >   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:55:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:56 GMT