W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: mapping of QNames to URIs? (in XHTML Role module)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:39:26 -0500
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Message-Id: <1191418766.16975.470.camel@pav>

On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 15:35 +0200, Steven Pemberton wrote:
> Dan,
> 
> Thanks. This is now fixed.

I'm interested to see how it's fixed. Is there an editor's
draft or something I can look at?


> Steven
> 
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:25:53 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> > A comment on
> >   http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role
> >   http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml-role-20061113
> >
> > Please clarify how QNames in the role attribute are mapped to URIs.
> >
> > Maybe it's already there and I'm just reading too fast? In any
> > case, for motivation, the March 2004 TAG finding, which concludes...
> >
> > "Where there is a compelling reason to use QNames instead of URIs for
> > identification, it is imperative that specifications provide a mapping
> > between QNames and URIs, if such a mapping is possible."
> >  -- Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in XML Content
> >   TAG Finding 17 March 2004
> >   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:39:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:56 GMT