W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > January to March 2007

Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be... xhtml?

From: Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:39:01 -0300
Message-ID: <4d90013f0703081439q17364710sc240a8727b46f887@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-html-editor@w3.org


I don't understand why the new version still refers to HTML, since it
is backwards incompatible. Is there any reason for this?

IMHO, a xhtml root element is more appropriate.

Greetings.

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 22:39:09 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Cowan: "CURIE/suffix URI ambiguity"
Previous message: Steven Pemberton: "Re: HTML Validators"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:32:02 GMT