W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: fieldset element at XHTML Print 1.0

From: Vicente Luque Centeno <vlc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:38:16 +0100 (CET)
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0703071727070.13198@violin.it.uc3m.es>

Thanks.

However, why don't the fieldset and legend elements make sense in 
XHTML Print?

Best regards.

Vicente Luque Centeno
Dep. Ingeniería Telemática
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Shane McCarron wrote:

> Basic forms was designed to provide a simple subset of forms - something 
> readily supportable on devices with limited processing and display 
> capabilities.  Those elements - in particular optgroup - did not call into 
> that collection. 
> Vicente Luque Centeno wrote:
>> 
>> In XHTML Print 1.0, elements like fieldset, legend and optgroup are
>> not allowed. Steven kindly told me that XHTML Print 1.0 uses the Basic
>> Forms module from XHTML Modularization (which does not recognize such
>> elements). Can someone explain why these elements were rejected from
>> the Basic Forms module from XHTML Modularization? Wouldn't it be wiser to 
>> have fieldset, legend and optgroup allowed in the Basic Forms module?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Vicente Luque Centeno
>> Dep. Ingeniería Telemática
>> Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
>> http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc
>
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 16:38:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:56 GMT