W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: XHTML 1.0 Strict and IFrames

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:48:48 +0200
To: mike@digitalhill.com, www-html-editor@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tp9e6tmvsmjzpq@acer3010.lan>

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:53:05 +0200, Mike Shelton <mike@digitalhill.com>  
wrote:
> I work for a web development company in Northern Indiana, USA. I have  
> worked very hard to fight for standard compliance and ensuring  
> compatibility across many platforms in my field, and I have defended it  
> to many of my colleagues. A question that has been stirring in mind for  
> a while now is: Why was the inner frame removed from the specification?

It wasn't. iframe is in HTML 4 Transitional (not strict) and in XHTML 1.0  
Transitional (not strict). So it was kept in the same place in both specs.

Best wishes,

Steven Pemberton
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 12:49:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:56 GMT