Hello Mimasa, all, On Oct 31, 2006, at 17:29 , Masayasu Ishikawa wrote: > [ Caveat: I'm no longer an HTML WG participant, so this reply does not > represent the HTML WG's position ] > See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2000OctDec/ > 0045 Right, the mail you refer to was for XHTML 1.0, but they have similar conformance models. Then I guess this is yet another issue of something that is in the conformance requirement, but cannot be checked fully against a DTD. Thanks. -- olivierReceived on Monday, 6 November 2006 00:21:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:17:31 GMT