W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:23:55 +0200
Message-Id: <6680D864-4A7A-44D9-9881-3CD5AED1337F@empyree.org>
To: www-html-editor@w3.org


Le 25 sept. 06 à 16:41, Jens Meiert a écrit :

>
>> <em> and <strong> really are just two variations on the same idea,
>> emphasis. Two tags could be merged as one.
>
> Can't keep back: And yet you still mean elements, not tags [1].  
> (The urge to write yet another article on that [2] has obviously  
> been justified. What's going on.)

Quoting Anne (<http://annevankesteren.nl/2004/05/tags-vs-elements>):
> <p> and </p> are tags.
>
> <p>Some text</p> is an element
I'm talking about "<em> and <strong>" (not about <em>Some text</em>  
and <strong>Some text</strong>). So tag is the right word. But thank  
you for pointing out Anne's article, it is very useful.

-- 
</david_latapie>
http://blog.empyree.org/   U+0F00
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 15:24:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:55 GMT