- From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:27:25 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-html-editor@w3.org
- Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
Le 25 sept. 06 à 15:00, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:54:30 +0200, David Latapie
> <david@empyree.org> wrote:
>> -- <em role="0"> default
>> -- <em role="+1"> equivalent to em
>> -- <em role="+2"> equivalent to strong
>> -- <em role="-1"> less important, may be rendered as font-
>> size:smaller
>
> This proposal doesn't cover nesting.
Do you mean emphasis inside an emphasis? I suggest *addition*
Animals (for instance dogs, like _mine_) do it
XHTML 2.0 Animals (<em role="-1">for instance dogs, like <em
role="+1">mine</em>)</em> do it
0
-1 +1=0 0
CSS voice-stress |--none-|-------------
reduced------------------|---------none-----------|-----none---|
(there may also be a final gap at the end of de-emphasis, but this is
not related to nesting, this is just an extra thought)
Please tell me if answsers shall not be forwarded to editor, only
initial proposals.
--
</david_latapie>
http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 13:28:01 UTC