W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > July to September 2006

[xhtml2] XHTML 2.0 Terms and Definitions

From: <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 03:27:36 -0000
To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060817032741.191FB4F588@homer.w3.org>

This is a QA Review comment for "XHTML 2.0"
8th WD

About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/terms.html

The definitions are sometimes not very clear and difficult to understand. Check XHTML 2.0 definitions against the W3C Glossary. For example, some definitions seem to be trapped in a model.

	"abstract module
    a unit of document type specification corresponding 
	to a distinct type of content, corresponding to a 
	markup construct reflecting this distinct type."

and then in the same page

	an abstract unit within a document model expressed as 
	a DTD fragment, used to consolidate markup declarations 
	to increase the flexibility, modifiability, reuse and 
	understanding of specific logical or semantic structures."
What about a module defined with a schema and not a DTD? The definition varies with regards to the one done on QA Glossary.

	A collection of semantically related features 
	that represents a unit of functionality."
	- http://www.w3.org/QA/glossary.html#module

Another example

	    a generally short file used to declare and 
	instantiate the modules of a DTD. A good rule of thumb 
	is that a DTD driver contains no markup declarations 
	that comprise any part of the document model itself."

"Good rule of thumb" is not appropriate in a definition section.

Double check all definitions with technical writers and implementers outside of the WG. People inside the WG know too much the technology to have a different light on the technology.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2006 03:27:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:08:55 UTC