Hi, This is a QA Review comment for "XHTML 2.0" http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/ 2006-07-26 8th WD About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/mod-image.html Does the img element make sense now that the src semantics has been moved to any element? Does it really help the transition to maintain it? Some people might do that. <div class="news"> <img class="newsitem" src="love-hate.html" srctype="text/html"/> </div> See the Mail "Helping Transition from XHTML 1.0 to XHML 2.0" -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Thursday, 17 August 2006 03:28:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:32:00 GMT