W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: Fwd: Requests for revising the XHTML 2.0 specification.

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:47:17 +0200
To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s7hhs3k464w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:43:01 +0200, Steven Pemberton  
<steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
> 1. Please allow MIME type text/xml+xhtml in the XHTML 2.0 specification.

There is no such media type.

> 2. Please allow IFRAME in the XHTML 2.0 specification. Microsoft
> Internet Explorer treats the OBJECT tag as ActiveX which is disabled
> by me and many other web users for security reasons, and thus many
> webpages do not display properly. Many webmasters would prefer IFRAME
> in XHTML 2.0 compliant webpages.

Internet Explorer doesn't support XHTML. What's the point of importing  
specific element names in a language that isn't backwards compatible or  
supported anyway? <iframe> in XHTML 2.0, or <object> for that matter would  
not work in Opera or Mozilla either...

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2006 12:47:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:08:54 UTC