W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: ***SPAM*** Issue about XHTML 2.0

From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w3future.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:05:13 +0200
Message-ID: <42D6C579.7040809@w3future.com>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: Min Zhang <belemcheung@hotmail.com>, www-html-editor@w3.org

Shane McCarron wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out - it was indeed a typo. We have fixed it
> for the next version.
> 
> For those of you interested, the HTML working group uses an extended
> XHTML for source (xhtmldoc). This extended XHTML has an "example"
> element, and in transitioning to it we accidently left in an old "pre"
> element, which is how examples used to be coded in the source.

Why don't you use a proper XML editor then?
And how do you convert xhtmldoc to proper xhtml? Not with XSLT it seems,
as the transformer would not have been able to parse the input XML file.

-- 
Sjoerd Visscher
http://w3future.com/weblog/
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2005 20:05:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17:55 GMT