* Tim Bray wrote: >>> Currently, the draft says *nothing* about xml:space (unless I'm >>> mis-using the search function). If you read the specification for >>> xml:space (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-white-space), all it says >>> is that this is a message from the author to downstream software. So >>> there is nothing anywhere that says anything normative about >>> xml:space. >> >> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#xmlspace cites a quite >> different opinion on this matter... > >Yes, well that opinion is (a) specific to HTML and (b) wrong. I'm >amazed that the W3C allowed that to be published. -Tim (Redirecting to the relevant mailing lists, etc) I thought so, too: http://hades.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/voyager-issues/Modularization-DTDs?id=6300#followup2 Maybe the HTML Working Group can reconsider this position in the light of Tim's disagreement? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 16:10:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:31:47 GMT