W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: [xframes] Remarks

From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:25:08 +0200
To: "Jens Meiert" <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <opsfeib6jesmjzpq@viao-1>

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:27:05 +0200 (MEST), Jens Meiert  
<jens.meiert@erde3.com> wrote:

>> [...] and there is no way to
>> tell the server "I only accept HTML without Frames".
> Well, but content negotiation also means "I prefer the German version of
> this resource", CMIIW. And to be honest, I don't know if this really does
> not work with framesets.

The remark in the spec is only about a user agent being able to tell the  
server that it can't process frames.

>> There is much discussion about the appropriateness of the style
>> attribute, since it undermines one of the basic premises of
>> stylesheets: the separation of content and presentation.
> I know this "discussion", and if you check my site you'll notice that I  
> even
> don't use "class" and "id" attributes to achieve a /full/ separation.

There's nothing in "class" and "id" that prevents a full separation of  
presentation and content.

Steven Pemberton
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 14:25:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:08:53 UTC