Dear HTML WG, please allow me two remarks concerning the XFrames Working Draft [1]: * What do you mean with "Since you can't content negotiatiate [...]" [2] -- ain't it true that you indeed can use content negotiation in framesets, e.g. by using "<frame id="foo" source="bar" />"? Or is this issue misleadingly formulated? * Ain't the "style" attribute missing in the list of Common Attributes [3]? -- I guess it's quite likely that this attribute will be the "regular" way to define frame measures (compared to the proposed definition via "class" attributes). By the way, I also found two typos: * Introduction: "several usability problem [...]" * Links and Targets [4]: "in some way targetted [...]" All the best, Jens. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_intro [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_common-attributes [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_links -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect (IxD) http://meiert.com/Received on Monday, 4 October 2004 10:30:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:31:46 GMT