> From: Henri Sivonen [mailto:hsivonen@iki.fi] ... > It is said that if a "charset" parameter is present for the > application/xhtml+xml MIME type, the only valid value is "utf-8". It > would make sense to allow "utf-16" as well. All XML processors are > required to support UTF-16 in addition to UTF-8, so allowing > UTF-16 for XHTML-Print doesn't cause any additional burden > to implementations. Also, the payload of > Application/Vnd.pwg-multiplexed chunks is defined > as octets, so UTF-16 strings can be delivered as > Application/Vnd.pwg-multiplexed chunks without any further encoding. > I tend to agree with Henri when he says that support UTF-16 would not be much more expensive than UTF-8. Does anyone on this list or the PWG's XHTML-Print list disagree? JimReceived on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:42:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:16:56 GMT