Re: Feedback on XHTML 2.0 WD (20030131)

Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote:

>4. XHTML 2.0 Document Type
>I'd like to see XHTML 2.0 also include MathML, not just XForms.
>(I know that's just a wish)
>
I don't think MathML belongs in XHTML, but there should be a DOCTYPE 
variant that includes it and SVG.

>6. Attribute Collections
>I'm sceptical about not having a style attribute.
>
What's the problem, it is no different from adding an ID and using and 
ID reference in the stylesheet.

-- 
Brant Langer Gurganus
<http://www.cherokeescouting.org/OtherUnits/Troop545IIN/brant.xhtml>

Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 15:29:12 UTC