<OriginalMessage From="Chris Croome [mailto:chris@webarchitects.co.uk]"> Since it's not too late how about someone in the W3C writing a Note about the use of link="rel"? These are some of the things I'd like to do with it: rel="meta" -- RDF metadata for the current document rel="meta sitemap" -- RDF or RSS file pointing to all meta data files on the site rel="sitemap" -- XHTML sitemap rel="syndication" -- RSS 1.0 headlines rel="alternate syndication" -- RSS 0.91 headlines Also Mozilla is now using rel="first", rel="last", rel="parent", rel="top", rel="icon", P3P has rel="P3Pv1", IE uses rel="shortcut icon", none of which are in HTML 4. </OriginalMessage> Yup, even XHTML m12n in XML Schema defines the rel link attr as (whitespace?) list of NMTOKENs (and not as a sequence of enumerations as I expected, I guess I should have done my homework): [...] <xs:attribute name="rel" type="LinkTypes"/> [...] <!-- space-separated list of link types --> <xs:simpleType name="LinkTypes"> <xs:list itemType="xs:NMTOKEN"/> </xs:simpleType> Kindest regards, ManosReceived on Thursday, 10 January 2002 08:14:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:50:51 GMT