W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Error (?) in xhtml-arch-1.mod

From: Gary Bentley <gb@opengroup.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:36:23 +0000
To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, mccarthy36@earthlink.net
Message-Id: <0112051436230D.05740@sinope>
Hi Masayasu,

So this has been identified, do you know of a timeframe when this fix would 
be rolled back into the base DTD?  

Unfortunately, due to application I am not able to use any workaround at all! 
 Thanks for the suggestions however...

Thanks for the reference to the full DTD.

Cheers,

Gary

On Wednesday 05 December 2001 14:10, Masayasu Ishikawa wrote:
> Gary Bentley <gb@opengroup.org> wrote:
> > You say that the architecture module should be ingored by default however
> > I am not able to find this in the DTDs, if you consider the following DTD
> > chain:
> >
> > xhtml-basic10.dtd
> >
> > includes:
> >
> > xhtml-framework-1.mod
> >
> > which then has a conditional item to pull in the xhtml-arch-1.mod
> > DTD, the condition for this is keyed on "xhtml-arch.module" which is
> > defined in xhtml-framework-1.mod as "INCLUDE", I can't find overriding
> > reference for xhtml-arch.module in any of the "higher" DTDs.
> >
> > So the question is, where is this default defined?
>
> That's the place there the default value is defined.  And
> unfortunately, the XHTML Modular Framework Module included in
> the XHTML Basic distribution had a bug to "INCLUDE" it by
> default.  The XHTML Modular Framework Module included in the
> "Modularization of XHTML" Recommendation [3] fixed this bug.
>
> > Unfortunately I am not able to override the DTD, i.e. write my own since
> > for the application I am writing I HAVE to use the W3C version.
>
> Another workaround is to include the following line
>
>    <!ENTITY % xhtml-arch.module "IGNORE" >
>
> in an internal DTD subset of your document.
>
> > Also, does anyone know of an expanded version of the XHTML Basic DTD,
> > i.e. one that has all the other DTDs pulled in and resolved, this would
> > be very useful when checking the validity of the markup I am writing.
>
> It's available at:
>
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic10-f.dtd
>
> > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-PITarget
> > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#Conformance
>
> [3]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/dtd_module_defs.html#a_xhtml_fram
>ework
>
> Regards,
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 09:33:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:48 UTC