W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Bugs in transitional dtd

From: <mrjtp@surfeu.fi>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:29:01 +0300
To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Message-id: <3b69397d.7c20.0@surfeu.fi>
Addition:

Also <iframe> - in my opinion - is incorrectly disallowed. Probably <noscript>
should also be allowed (because it's an inline element in XHTML), although it
wasn't allowed in HTML4

Jukka Pietarinen




>From: mrjtp@surfeu.fi
>Received: from [213.173.154.9] (HELO surfeu.fi)
>  by surfeu.fi (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.1)
>  with SMTP id 6880157 for www-html-editor@w3.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2001 19:22:44
+0300
>Sender: mrjtp@surfeu.fi
>Reply-to: mrjtp@surfeu.fi
>To: www-html-editor@w3.org
>Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 19:22:44 +0300
>Subject: Bugs in transitional dtd
>X-Mailer: CWMail Web to Mail Gateway 2.6k, http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm

>Message-id: <3b682cd4.6493.0@surfeu.fi>
>X-User-Info: 195.10.190.217
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Bugs in XHTML 1.0 Transitional dtd
>
>[ allowed content of <pre> ]
>
>1) <script>, <strike> (but not <s>), <ins>, and <del> are incorrectly disallowed

>within <pre> (they were allowed in HTML 4)
>
>2) In the dtd, <sub>, and <sub> elements are in fact allowed via the %phrase

>entity (comment is misleading)
>
>3) Appendix B; should'n <basefont> and <font> be listed for alement <pre>?

>
>Jukka Pietarinen
>
>http://www.surfeu.fi
>
>

http://www.surfeu.fi
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2001 07:29:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:08:29 UTC