W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG

From: Jon Bosak <bosak@boethius.eng.sun.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 22:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199905180511.WAA01325@boethius.eng.sun.com>
To: Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl
CC: bill.smith@sun.com, w3c-xml-cg@w3.org, w3c-html-wg@w3.org, www-html-editor@w3.org, w3c-xml-linking-wg@w3.org
[Steven Pemberton:]

| I was under the impression that the fact that the "space before /"
| quirk in empty elements (like <br />) works on old browsers was one of
| the reasons for choosing the <br/> syntax for XML. That was one of the
| motivations for creating the guidelines.

Nope.  The first time I heard of the "space before /" hack was in
XHTML.  The syntax "<foo/>" for an empty element was chosen because it
is, believe it or not, legal SGML.  Yes, ISO 8879:1986 SGML.  Given
the right SGML declaration, "/>" is a null end tag or "NET," hence the
name "stupid NET trick" as the subject line for the discussion that
led to this decision.  If I remember correctly, the Web-SGML TC
generalized this empty-element syntax for SGML.  But the space-before
business is pure XHTML.

Received on Tuesday, 18 May 1999 01:11:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:08:21 UTC