Re: Broken process for errata [was: Re: Report...]

Actually the spec is bogus anyway. If not in using "he" for hebrew, it
is in only refering to ISO 639, which is confusing. I checked on it
myself, following the link given in the spec [1], and could only
conclude that there was really an error. If there is an addundum to the
ISO 639 it should be given.

At http://www.sil.org/sgml/iso639a.html, ISO 636 is said to be last
modified on July 11, 1997. How come the code listed there isn't "he"
then? In case of conflict who should we believe?
-- 
Arnaud Le Hors - W3C, User Interface Domain - www.w3.org/People/Arnaud

Received on Friday, 19 December 1997 18:52:05 UTC