W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > May 2011

Re: XForms 1.1 Implementers encouraged to enable multiple MIP bindings per data node

From: Joern Turner <joern.turner@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:49:03 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTim3e4t0pTMdztJWKmPAOY0KiiFmEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: "www-forms@w3.org" <www-forms@w3.org>
Dear Working Group,

i'm considering to implement the proposal below. However i cannot make
any sense out of the proposed AND combinator for the 'type' MIP. What
shall be the meaning in this case? That a node e.g. can be a string
AND an integer at the same time? I'm sure i must have misunderstood
something here.

Would be happy if you can shed some light on this.

Thanks

Joern Turner

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:06 PM, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Forms Community,
>
> It is a pleasure to inform you that the W3C Forms Working Group recently
> decided upon a default combination mechanism for handling multiple model
> item properties binding to the same data node. For reference, please see [1,
> 2]
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/MIPS
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/03/25-forms-minutes.html#res_multimip
>
> For some MIPs like calculate, more than one formula binding does not make
> sense, so the default in that case continues to be an
> xforms-binding-exception.  However, for other MIPs, and most notably
> constraint, it is not only possible but also preferable to have a default
> combinator based on the MIP.  For example, if more than one constraint MIP
> is applied, then all constraints must be satisfied (true) for the node to be
> valid (in fact, this is consistent with current combination processing of
> constraint, required and type MIPs anyway).  By comparison, a node would be
> readonly if any bind readonly MIP evaluates to true for the node, and this
> is conceptually what already happens in the defaulting mechanism for
> readonly, which makes a node readonly if any ancestor evaluates to true even
> if the readonly MIP for the node itself is false.
>
> For these technical reasons and also to promote faster adoption and
> determination of any problems with the approach, the W3C Forms Working Group
> also resolved (see [3]) to encourage implementers of XForms 1.1 to proceed
> with relaxing the xforms-binding-exception for selected MIPs and instead use
> the default combinators as described in [1].
>
> [3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2010Apr/att-0002/2010-04-07.html#resolution1
>
> Best regards,
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> STSM, Lotus Forms
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
> Blog RSS feed:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 May 2011 14:49:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:22 GMT