W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > November 2007

Re: [XForms 1.1] Questioning the iteration of certain actions (section 10.15)

From: Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <unlisse@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:53:13 +0100
Message-ID: <da289f40711210553t3d23673fpdbfdcb7b4dc6ea1b@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org, www-forms@w3.org
John,

XForms 1.1 supports asynchronous submissions by default. So it is
perfectly possible for if/while-expressions to evaluate differently
over time even when the corresponding action doesn't change the model
itself.

Regards,
Uli.

On Nov 12, 2007 8:59 PM, Clark, John <CLARKJ2@ccf.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> To Whom It May Concern:
>
>  The XForms 1.1 Actions Module[0] supports iterated actions using the
> `while` attribute.  This attribute is allowed on any action element, but it
> seems that it is only useful on a subset of the possible action elements.
> The `xf:message`[1] action "encapsulates a message to be displayed to the
> user"; it does not change the model, and so the `while` expression will
> remain true after each display of the message, causing an infinite loop.  It
> also might not make sense to allow the `while` attribute on the
> `xf:setfocus`, `xf:load`, `xf:rebuild`, `xf:recalculate`, `xf:refresh`, or
> `xf:revalidate` actions for essentially the same reason as in the case of
> `xf:message`, but I am less sure of those cases.
>
>  Should the specification disallow the use of the `while` attribute in these
> problematic cases?  If not, in what way is iteration useful in these cases?
>
>  Thank you for your consideration.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
>      John L. Clark
>
>  [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#action
>
>  [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#action-message
>
>
>
>
>
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
> in America by U.S. News & World Report (2007).
> Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
> a complete listing of our services, staff and
> locations.
>
>
> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
>
>



-- 
Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 13:53:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:11 GMT