W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...

From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:10:15 -0700
Message-ID: <E254B0A7E0268949ABFE5EA97B7D0CF402E48359@usa7061ms01.na.xerox.net>
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Laurens Holst" <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "Dave Raggett" <dsr@w3.org>, <public-html@w3.org>, <www-forms@w3.org>

Ian,
You might give some thought to an extensions framework.
Vendors will always have proprietary extensions, and customers will always want to push them towards standardization.
XSLT has done well with that the exslt.org website as a gathering place for new features to be used and tested when they can't go into a specification yet.
Leigh.

-----Original Message-----
From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11:59 PM
To: Laurens Holst
Cc: Håkon Wium Lie; Dave Raggett; public-html@w3.org; www-forms@w3.org
Subject: Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Laurens Holst wrote:
> 
> Question is, if the W3C 'takes over' the WHATWG spec, will the 
> WHATWG respect the takeover and stop working on them, or will it keep on 
> developing their specification in parallel? And if it stops, maybe, as 
> all specifications now also have W3C equivalants, the WHATWG does not 
> have a purpose to exist anymore?

The WHATWG isn't going to stop; however, we could, with permission from 
Apple, Opera, and Mozilla, have both this HTML working group's 
specification and the WHATWG's specification be the same actual document 
(just with different headers and styles). If we do this, I would be happy 
to act as editor for this working group's specification, and would ensure 
that it and the current Web Applications 1.0 specification stay exactly in 
sync (by simply editing one document). This is how the Web Forms 2.0 
specification was edited in the WAF working group -- the version published 
by the WAF and the version published by the WHATWG at the same time were 
identical, built from the same sources. In fact it's also how the WAF XBL2 
specification and the Mozilla XBL2 specification are written: they are 
built from the same sources and therefore stay exactly in sync (I am 
editor for both the Web Forms 2.0 and XBL2 specifications in the WAF, and 
edit the WHATWG Web Forms 2 draft and the Mozilla XBL2 document).

If the HTML WG and the WHATWG don't publish the same specification, then 
I, on behalf of the WHATWG, will ensure that the two specifications remain 
consistent and compatible, by ensuring that the WHATWG specification is 
always a strict superset or more detailed version of the HTML WG spec.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 17:11:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:09 GMT