Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2

Klotz, Leigh wrote:

> If Opera had wanted to engage, it would have done so in the many
> previous years, and if Opera had concerns about the direction of XForms
> (or even XHTML (or even XML)) it would have done so at the charter and
> requirements document stages.  Not doing so was a business decision, and
> I can't argue with that.  But please don't confuse those business
> decisions with technical objections, of which there were none expressed.

Sorry, was I reading the same document as you? I saw a list of technical 
problems that Apple and Opera identified...

-- 
"Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?"
  -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead