W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > January 2007

Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2

From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:00:59 +0000
Message-ID: <45B8F05B.9060700@cam.ac.uk>
To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, www-forms@w3.org, WHAT WG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>

Klotz, Leigh wrote:

> If Opera had wanted to engage, it would have done so in the many
> previous years, and if Opera had concerns about the direction of XForms
> (or even XHTML (or even XML)) it would have done so at the charter and
> requirements document stages.  Not doing so was a business decision, and
> I can't argue with that.  But please don't confuse those business
> decisions with technical objections, of which there were none expressed.

Sorry, was I reading the same document as you? I saw a list of technical 
problems that Apple and Opera identified...

-- 
"Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?"
  -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 18:01:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:08 GMT