W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > February 2007

RE: Event handlers defined in irrelevant form blocks

From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:51:04 -0800
Message-ID: <E254B0A7E0268949ABFE5EA97B7D0CF402C0914F@usa7061ms01.na.xerox.net>
To: <Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivedesigners.com>
Cc: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-request@w3.org>

Oops! 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivedesigners.com
[mailto:Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivedesigners.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:00 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Clark, John; www-forms@w3.org; www-forms-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: Event handlers defined in irrelevant form blocks

All,

Didn't this recently change by issuing erratum 31.2 Rigorously Define 
Non-relevant Form Control 
(http://www.w3.org/2006/03/REC-xforms-20060314-errata.html#E31b)? It 
explicitly states that "A critical part of this erratum is that XForms 
action handlers for events on the form control are disabled when the 
control is non-relevant" this the of course repeated in the 'Changed 
specification wording' section "When a form control becomes
non-relevant, 
it must receive event xforms-disabled and then the XForms action
handlers 
that are listening for events on the non-relevant form control must be 
disabled."  Or am I reading this incorrectly?

Regards,

Nick Van den Bleeken  -  Research & Development
Inventive Designers
Phone: +32 - 3 - 8210170
Fax: +32 - 3 - 8210171
Email: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivedesigners.com

www-forms-request@w3.org wrote on 02/05/2007 07:00:37 PM:

> 
> John,
> No, relevance has no effect on action handlers.  Relevance does affect
> submission and validation (modulo the submission/@relevant attribute).
> There are also some events that are sent to in response to relevance
or
> instance node appearance/disappearance (xforms-enabled,
xforms-disabled)
> so you will see some effect there.  (Does anybody think differently
> here?)
> 
> Although it doesn't have to be the case, most XForms 1.0 integrations
> with XHTML use relevance to control the :enable and :disabled CSS
> properties. 
> 
> If you need to control actions, take a look at the new conditional
> attributes on actions in XForms 1.1.
> Leigh. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Clark, John
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 7:24 AM
> To: www-forms@w3.org
> Subject: Event handlers defined in irrelevant form blocks
> 
> 
> If you define an event handler somewhere in a form element, and that
> form element becomes irrelevant, does that disable (or in any other
way
> change) the event handler somehow?  Does it matter whether or not the
> observer for the event handler is a descendant of the irrelevant form
> element?
> 
> Take care,
> 
>     John L. Clark  |  Systems Analyst
>                    |  Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Research
>  Cleveland Clinic  |  9500 Euclid Ave.   |  Cleveland, OH 44195
>                    |  (216) 445-6011
> 
> ===================================
> 


--------------------------------------------------
Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 17:51:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:08 GMT