W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > September 2006

Re: Feed back on 1.0: Meaning of incremental attribute

From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:52:52 -0700
To: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Cc: www-forms@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFE46DAE72.12BFB0D1-ON882571ED.006224E1-882571ED.00623AE2@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Erik,

It already says something along these lines, so perhaps nothing more needs 
to be said after all.

Cheers,
John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
Senior Product Architect/Research Scientist
Co-Chair, W3C XForms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com  http://www.ibm.com/software/

Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer





Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> 
Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org
09/18/2006 06:09 AM

To
www-forms@w3.org
cc

Subject
Re: Feed back on 1.0: Meaning of incremental attribute







John Boyer wrote:
> 
> In Xforms 1.0, the description of the incremental attribute is 
inadequate.

I agree with this part of the post.

> I think that it could be described 
> though that incremental="true" means that each modification of the UI 
> control by the user is committed to data. 

I disagree with "each" here: a user may be typing fast in an input or 
text field, and committing data upon each keystroke may have negative 
performance implications.

This is particularly true if your XForms engine is distributed between 
client and server, where latency makes it even more impractical to send 
each and every keystroke to the server.

I think it would be reasonable to say that changes should be committed 
"from time to time", so as to give the user the perception that changes 
are taken into account immediately, but not necessarily upon each 
keystroke.

-Erik

-- 
Orbeon - XForms Everywhere:
http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Monday, 18 September 2006 17:53:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:06 GMT