W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > September 2006

RE: XForms and Web Forms 2.0

From: Dharmesh Mistry <Dharmesh.Mistry@edgeipk.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:14:30 +0100
Message-ID: <6E80CFEBE068F44BAD79EB89CA1FD59168FD3B@edgemail01.uk.edgeipk.com>
To: "Elliotte Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, <www-forms@w3.org>
Good point ;o)

It was the consumers (buyers) that decided not the engineers.

So WF2 assumes developers don't want to re-skill, but Xforms assumes that the rendering flexibility of Xforms is more important ? 

Dharmesh Mistry
CTO, edge IPK
E: dharmesh@edgeipk.com 
M: 07789 222 015
Newbury Office                   
T  +44 (0) 1635 231 231   (ext 221)
F  +44 (0) 1635 569 371
This message may contain information which is confidential or privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply
e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.
edge IPK Limited
Registered office - 9 Wardle Avenue, Tilehurst, Reading, Berkshire RG31 6JR
Registered in England No. 4286817

-----Original Message-----
From: Elliotte Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu] 
Sent: 05 September 2006 15:25
To: Dharmesh Mistry
Cc: Lachlan Hunt; Steven Pemberton; www-forms@w3.org
Subject: Re: XForms and Web Forms 2.0

Dharmesh Mistry wrote:

> I agree with Mark Birbeck, however taking a pure technology route we all 
> know that BetaMax was better than VHS, but VHS won the standards war.

We may all know that, but that doesn't make it true. VHS won because it 
was better along the axis that consumers cared about more: recording 
time. BetaMax was superior along an axis that consumers cared about much 
less: picture quality. See 

Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!


Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 15:14:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:36:18 UTC