W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > May 2006

Re: Because type is for datatype, there should not be a problem for XForms Basic

From: Allan Beaufour <beaufour@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:24:06 +0200
Message-ID: <90d6cb0e0605110424o1d61e1c9jf5ce95b16c296cd5@mail.gmail.com>
To: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: www-forms@w3.org

On 5/8/06, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> By context, I mean the XForms recommendation, specifically Section 6.1.1, which is the
> one we are going 'round and 'round discussing the meaning of.  I cannot see how that
> was unclear in my last email on this thread.

That was also my assumption, but instead of guessing and possibly
misinterpreting, I asked.

But I give up. We have different views. I try hard to see it from both
sides, from a generic context of "XForms", without counting words or
regards to how many years I have had a personal view of something. You
seem to have one concrete (implementation?) view, and that is
apparently the absolute truth. It's hard, if possible at all, to
discuss then.

-- 
... Allan
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 11:24:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:04 GMT