- From: Allan Beaufour <beaufour@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:23:52 +0200
- To: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
On 5/5/06, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > And the interpretation you give takes on two contradictions when put in context. I try to make my context "XForms". Which two contradictions are you referring to? > Finally, the interpretation of the type MIP as datatype validation only means goodness for XForms basic. Leigh raised that issue almost two years ago. I see no point in suddenly rushing for a specific interpretation because it means goodness for XForms Basic. I would rather have a good solution that we can all agree to. I think that it makes sense to be able to apply complex types with <bind type"..."/>. -- ... Allan
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 10:24:00 UTC