I am reading the erratum here: http://www.w3.org/2003/10/REC-xforms-10-20031014-errata.html#E29 This means to me that in the following example: <my-element>2000-01-02</my-element> Where we have a schema saying: <element name="my-element" type="date"/> o Validity for <my-element> is determined by: o the presence of the correct attributes (none here); an invalid value for an attribute does not cause my-element to be invalid o the validity of children elements (none here) o the validity of the children text nodes (here 2000-01-02) Now for the last point, the erratum says that: "The XML Schema validity of a text node is defined as the locally [sic] validity of its normalized content with respect to the type definition associated from a model bind as defined by String Valid. If the text node has no type associated it is always considered valid." This appears to mean that "2000-01-02" will not be validated with the schema's type="date" constraint, but rather that you need to have a separate xforms:bind/@type attribute. However, this appears a little curious. Does anybody have a better understanding of this issue? What is the spec's intent? Thanks, -ErikReceived on Monday, 6 June 2005 19:43:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:01 GMT