W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > December 2005

value-changing

From: <rob.bull@blackdog.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:30:55 +0000
To: www-forms@w3.org
Cc: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
Message-Id: <E1EhkmF-0007bH-Ef@oceanus.uk.clara.net>

Hi Mark, 

Many thanks for that, I had been assuming that the value-changed event 
occurred after the DOMFocusOut, but it looks as if I was mistaken. I think 
that I may have been confused by the case sensitivity of 'value-changed'. It 
works brillianty for my purpose with FP anyway, 

TVM, 

Rob 


Robert, 

Just use xforms-value-changed. The 'ing' event used to be for @incremental, 
but the XForms model doesn't have any notion of the model being in some 
intermediate state, so there is no concept of data changing, only changed. 
It was therefore dropped. 

Regards, 

Mark 

Mark Birbeck
CEO
x-port.net Ltd. 

e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ 

Download our XForms processor from
http://www.formsPlayer.com/ 

 

 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 ----
From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf 
Of Robert Bull
Sent: 30 November 2005 22:52
To: www-forms@w3.org
Subject: value-changing 


I have probably missed a massive "thread" somewhere along the line, but 
somehow the removal of the value-changing event between the candidate 
recommendation and the recommendation seems to have passed me by. 

I have searched my e-mail archive in vain; has this event been left out of 
xForms 1.0? 

Is there anything similar that implementations capture to monitor instance 
manipulation? 

RR
****************************************************
*  This e-mail is for the intended recipient only, *
*  its contents and the content of any attachments *
*  is copyright material belonging to HoT Training *
*  and Consultancy Ltd, and all information herein *
*  should be treated as Company Confidential       *
**************************************************** 
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 09:31:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:02 GMT