W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > October 2003

RE: Question about XForms Basic

From: David Cleary <davec@progress.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:06:42 -0400
To: "'DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)'" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>, "'Klotz, Leigh'" <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>, www-forms@w3c.org
Message-id: <003b01c398c7$401d6d10$d46712ac@bedford.progress.com>

"XForms is aimed at the specialist form authoring world, for products that
will not typically be sent over, or used as part of, the World Wide Web."

One would hope, based on the sentence above, that the W3C will not accept
this as a note.

Dave 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-forms-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:48 PM
> To: 'Klotz, Leigh'; 'www-forms@w3c.org'
> Subject: RE: Question about XForms Basic
> 
> 
> 
> I wouldn't consider it a W3C WD until it shows up on 
> www.w3.org/tr. I'm guessing that it was > developed for 
> submission to the W3C using a W3C-like stylesheet to give it 
> that W3C look.
> 
> Bob
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klotz, Leigh [mailto:Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:39 PM
> To: 'www-forms@w3c.org'
> Cc: 'w3c-archive@w3.org'
> Subject: Question about XForms Basic
> 
> 
> 
> A google search turned up the following W3C Working Draft: 
> http://www.damowmow.com/temp/hfp.html
> A closer inspection 
> shows that the W3C trademark is used with a "soon" after it. 
> I found this confusing.
> 
> Is this a W3C Working Draft?  Is it perhaps some W3C Member 
> Confidential data that was inadvertently published?
> 
> Or is there no relationship between this document and the W3C?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Leigh L. Klotz, Jr.
> Senior Software Architect
> Xerox Corporation
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:06:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:56 GMT