W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > July 2003

AW: Internet Exploder Is A Museum Piece

From: Roman Huditsch <roman.huditsch@hico.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:20:50 +0200
Message-ID: <0C79A363CB0321418927D0CB1AD0403C29AA37@hicoetsrv000006.hico.local>
To: <Hemant.Desai@patni.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>
Cc: "Gerald Bauer" <luxorxul@yahoo.ca>

I totally agree with Hemant and Chris.
This list is supposed to discuss XForms and related topics.
There should be no political discussion or any kind of slating 
in regard to any vendor implementation.

with best regards,

Mag.(FH) Roman Huditsch (hRHU )
Developer .:. Information & Application Engineering 
hico Informations- und Kommunikations-Management Gesellschaft m.b.H.
TechLab, Thomas A. Edison Straße 2.
A-7000 Eisenstadt / Austria
phone: +43/2682/704-61-73; fax: +43/2682/704-71-61-10
e-mail: roman.huditsch@hico.com
mobile: +43/664/4102715

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Hemant Desai [mailto:Hemant.Desai@patni.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 07:30
An: www-forms@w3.org
Cc: Gerald Bauer
Betreff: RE: Internet Exploder Is A Museum Piece

This looks quite un professional....and should be avoided !

also the bit abt Iraq and their love for Saddam Hussein ..well lets just
keep it out of this...u probably only know as much as u see (and u probably
see only what u are wanted to be seeing..)
the same may be true for ur opinion abt IE ...

Hemant Desai

-----Original Message-----
From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Gerald Bauer
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:04 AM
To: www-forms@w3.org
Subject: Internet Exploder Is A Museum Piece


> not a place for
> trashing a company you don't like, or arguing holy
> wars. There are Microsoft employees on this list -
> isn't it a bit disrespectful to call their work
> "Internet Exploder?"

  Face it Internet Exploder is a museum piece.
Microsoft has frozen it for years and Internet
Exploder won't be available anymore as a standalone
add-on package for any OS. If you want to get any bugs
fixed you will be forced to upgrade to the next-gen
Windows OS code-named Longhorn.

> I have to agree with Jane entirely. Choice is not a
> purely wonderful thing.

  Sure. Why don't you move to North Korea to cut back
on your choices you have to make in life?

> For developers, it creates a larger set of bugs -
> one new set for every browser - and no, yours won't
> be perfect either, and no, no browser ever will be,
> no matter what the quality of standards. Supporting
> a wider number of vendors means a smaller and
> smaller subset of working features. This "It limps
> but it works" is not ideal, but when using a
> technology that has many, many vendors, it is the
> only option.

  What nonsense. It is not the only option and the
internet is proof that open royality-free standards
(e.g. TCP/IP, HTML, HTTP, and so on) work much better
than single-vendor, secret-sauce defacto standards
like the Microsoft Windows tyranny.

> For the average user, they really don't care what
> browser they're using. They just want a browser.
> They don't want a choice.
> They want to sit down and read some e-mail and a
> news page, and leave. Whatever's in front of them
> will do.

  I guess that's like saying the Iraquis don't want to
be free. They love Sadam Hussein, don't they? They
just want to go on with life. Who cares about
politics? What short-sighted nonsense.

  - Gerald

Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 02:22:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:36:08 UTC