W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XForms Implementations which are actually Working software??

From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@mozquito.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:24:57 +0100
Message-ID: <013601c2c923$c4bfaed0$fc45a8c0@c020>
To: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>, <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <xforms@yahoogroups.com>

Typo in the URI of my blog, corrected:

[2] http://webaccess.mozquito.com/features/index.xml

- Sebastian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>
To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>; <www-forms@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: XForms Implementations which are actually Working software??


>
> Andrew, all,
>
> I'm starting to like your humor :-) You never give up, do you?
>
> Organizing beta-testers and checking the implementations like
> a lawyer seems to be both constructive for XForms as well as
> fit your personality...  *chuckle*
>
> Go for it. Just don't start again making people and yourself
> look stupid. We can really all live together in a friendly and
> respectful manner... So let's move on....
>
> The W3C is holding a public implementation workshop end
> of February [1].
>
> Anyone can show up claiming he has XForms 1.0 CR
> implementation. The working group will be there. We will
> look at the stuff. Feedback from that Workshop as well as
> perhaps results from your latest endeavour, Andrew, will help
> us clean up and re-organize the List of Implementations on the
> W3C XForms page...
>
> :-)
>
> Just to not leave the impression as if there weren't several
> real pieces of software working, I've been successfully managing
> my blog over at [2] for over half a year thru an XForm in
> X-Smiles. Novell XForms and FormsPlayer to me seem to be in
> really good shape too. With my own implementor's hat on, yes,
> DENG is still work-in-progress and not just there yet. :-)
> In general, getting more information on the exact state
> of *all* implementations is a Good Thing. The WG is holding
> the implementation workshop, other efforts in that direction
> are - of course - most welcome and appreciated...
>
> - Sebastian
>
> [1]
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2003/ImplementationWorkshop/Overview.html
> [2] http://webaccess.mozquito.com/feautres/index.xml
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
> To: <www-forms@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:07 PM
> Subject: XForms Implementations which are actually Working software??
>
>
> >
> > I was wondering if members of the two mailing lists could collectively
> list
> > all the XForms implementations that are currently functional? ... by
which
> I
> > mean implementations which (more or less, please state which) provide
the
> > functionality of the XForms CR (either conforming level is of interest
to
> > me).
> >
> > I know that the W3C XForms page lists many pieces of software but (at
> least
> > according to the description on the Web page) some of those appear to be
> > "wish ware" rather than projects which have functioning software
currently
> > available.
> >
> > Over to the implementors ..... :) ... Which of you have software which
is
> > currently functional and publicly available?
> >
> > Alternatively are there XForms implementors out there who would
appreciate
> > some more beta testers?
> >
> > Andrew Watt
> > "XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to
> implement
> > yesterday's technology tomorrow"
> >
>
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 07:26:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:54 GMT