W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > February 2003

RE: XForms Implementation Strategy?

From: Sikora, Gary <gary.sikora@progeny.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:34:50 -0500
Message-ID: <D27363C4B7977B4DAEBFCFA059BCA5D407DA0F@es1.progeny.net>
To: <Robert_Barker@Vanguard.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>

If you adopt the layered approach to Web application and content
authoring then XForms does have a place regardless of user agent
(browser) capability.  For example, if content is divided into data,
logic, interaction, style, layout and customization, then XForms is a
good choice to represent the interaction layer.  Server-side
transcoders, XSLT or code, can be used to transform this content into
user agent compatible markup such as DHTML.

Gary Sikora

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert_Barker@Vanguard.com [mailto:Robert_Barker@Vanguard.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:15 AM
To: www-forms@w3.org
Subject: XForms Implementation Strategy?


My understanding is that today none of the "big" browsers currently
support
XForms.

Are Corporations currently developing applications using XForms?  If so,
what types, internal or external?
What is a typical strategy for XForms adoption in corporations?

Thanks.
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 08:39:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:54 GMT