Gerald, >After all 1.0 versions never really catch on, do they? What we're discussing is technologies based on XML. XML 1.0. >I wouldn't call a single academic research >prototype site significant content. You haven't given any indication that you've looked. >See that's my point. Specs rarely work if the leads >don't "eat their own dogfood", that is, build a >working prototype themselves. I'm not sure what a "spec lead" is, but every one of the editors of XForms is involved in implementing either an XForms motor or authoring tool. Your opinions will carry more influence when they are backed by facts and research. .micahReceived on Monday, 14 April 2003 14:44:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:01:52 GMT