W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > September 2002

Re: [Moderator Action] Re: FORMs and GET

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:32:26 +0200
Message-ID: <0c7801c2534e$5835cab0$228a608a@inria.fr>
To: "GILCHRIST Roland" <Roland.Gilchrist@state.or.us>, <www-forms@w3.org>

Moderator: sent to <www-forms@w3.org>
----- Original Message -----
From: "GILCHRIST Roland" <Roland.Gilchrist@state.or.us>
To: "IPM Return requested (Receipt notification requested)"
<paul@prescod.net>; "IPM Return requested (Receipt notification requested)"
<tvraman@almaden.ibm.com>
Cc: "IPM Return requested (Receipt notification requested)"
<MDubinko@cardiff.com>; "IPM Return requested (Receipt notification
requested)" <www-forms@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 10:07 PM
Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: FORMs and GET


>
>
> Please remove my address from your future mailings. Thank you very much.
> roland.gilchrist@state.or.us
>
> >>> paul@prescod.net 01/18/02 06:45PM >>>
> tvraman@almaden.ibm.com wrote:
> >
> > Also note that most server-side processors including all the popular
> > CGI libraries for the various popular languages
> > will deliver GET and POST data in a uniform manner, i.e. it's usually
> > a safe bet to POST data to something that looks like it will only
> > accept a GET.
>
> My concern is with the client, not the server. I constantly cut
> GET-generated URLs out of my browser bar and paste them into emails and
> documents. That's why HTML forms were designed the way they were.
>
>  Paul Prescod
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 09:32:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:52 GMT