W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > January 2002

RE: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002

From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:17:48 -0800
Message-ID: <E840F0B7E6189547BDB91DA8BF2228AB28C182@csmail.cardiff.com>
To: 'Jérôme Nègre' <jerome.negre@e-xmlmedia.fr>, www-forms@w3.org
Jérôme,

Your message has been forwarded to the www-forms-editor list [1], where we
are archiving Last Call comments. Most definately we are concerned with
these issues, and they will be addressed in the LC process. No guarantees on
any particular outcome, though. :-)

.micah

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2002Jan/0002.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Jérôme Nègre [mailto:jerome.negre@e-xmlmedia.fr]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:43 AM
To: www-forms@w3.org
Subject: Re: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002


Just one more point:

Am I the only one to be concerned by those issues?

Jérôme

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jérôme Nègre" <jerome.negre@e-xmlmedia.fr>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:55 PM
Subject: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002


> Hi all,
>
> Here are some remarks I had while reading the new draft:
>
> 1/ There is an inconsistence in the target of xforms:formControlInitialize
> between chapters 4.2.4 and 4.2.5.
> See previous thread "Target of xforms:xformControlInitialize" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2001Dec/0051.html
>
> 2/ There is an inconsistence in the default processing of xforms:focus
> between chapters 4.3.3 and 10.5.
> See previous thread "Event xforms:focus" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Jan/0028.html
>
> 3/ The sequence of actions in response to xforms:valueChanged is a bit
> strange in chapter 4.3.6.
> See previous thread "Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2001Dec/0076.html
>
> 4/ There is no support of dependencies between several models (chapters
> 4.3.6, 4.3.17 and 10.3).
> See previous threads "recalculating several models" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Jan/0007.html
> and "scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Jan/0014.html
>
> 5/ The PDF version is not up-to-date with the HTML version (at least
missing
> parts in chapter D).
>
> Regards,
> Jérôme Nègre
>
>
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 14:20:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:50 GMT