W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > January 2002

Re: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002

From: Jérôme Nègre <jerome.negre@e-xmlmedia.fr>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:43:11 +0100
Message-ID: <008701c1a4b3$54eacda0$630aa8c0@fischer>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>
Just one more point:

Am I the only one to be concerned by those issues?

Jérôme

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jérôme Nègre" <jerome.negre@e-xmlmedia.fr>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:55 PM
Subject: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002


> Hi all,
>
> Here are some remarks I had while reading the new draft:
>
> 1/ There is an inconsistence in the target of xforms:formControlInitialize
> between chapters 4.2.4 and 4.2.5.
> See previous thread "Target of xforms:xformControlInitialize" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2001Dec/0051.html
>
> 2/ There is an inconsistence in the default processing of xforms:focus
> between chapters 4.3.3 and 10.5.
> See previous thread "Event xforms:focus" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Jan/0028.html
>
> 3/ The sequence of actions in response to xforms:valueChanged is a bit
> strange in chapter 4.3.6.
> See previous thread "Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2001Dec/0076.html
>
> 4/ There is no support of dependencies between several models (chapters
> 4.3.6, 4.3.17 and 10.3).
> See previous threads "recalculating several models" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Jan/0007.html
> and "scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)" or
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Jan/0014.html
>
> 5/ The PDF version is not up-to-date with the HTML version (at least
missing
> parts in chapter D).
>
> Regards,
> Jérôme Nègre
>
>
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 03:45:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:50 GMT