W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > January 2002

RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms

From: Benjamin D. Gray <BDGray@uwyo.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:11:46 -0700
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: www-forms@w3.org
Message-id: <65685200AF3BE841842736134739723014A4CB@POSTOFFICE.uwyo.edu>

If GET is deprecated, then what is a bookmarkable URI/URL that would be
created upon submitting some form (whether XForms or some new form
(GForms))?  I'm open to any implementation that would fill the void that
removing GET would leave.


Benjamin D. Gray
WIND Web Developer
http://wind.uwyo.edu/


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:01 pm
To: David E. Cleary
Cc: Paul Prescod; Tim Bray; www-forms@w3.org
Subject: Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms [was:
Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
David,

I think this statement of yours sums things up for me;

> XForms is not about submitting name/value pairs. It is about
submitting XML.
> While we added support for legacy servers, that was meant to be
temporary.
> If deprecating GET and urlencoded data is a problem, I would support
> removing them entirely instead of making them something XForms must
support
> moving forward.

That would satisfy me.  But note that if you do this, XForms *cannot*
replace HTML forms, and I'd suggest adding a *prominent* note saying so
to the spec.

MB
--
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 15:13:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:50 GMT