W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Heads up: comments from CSS WG on XForms *are* coming...

From: thierry michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:30:35 +0100
Message-ID: <029301c1ba3c$afec0810$228a608a@inria.fr>
To: "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>, <www-forms@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
Bert,

Thank you for your comment.
It is included in our
Last Call Responses tracking document
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Group/LastCallResponses.html

We have also organized a 2 hours slot Meeting with CSS WG to coordinate CSS
and XForms
on  Friday March 1th at  13:30-15:30
as mentionned in the Xforms F2F Agenda
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Group/2002/f2f-Cannes/Overview.html

We will be answering Last call comments starting thrusday morning.
Therefore you must to provide your comments before Thursday, Feb 28.
but if you can provide earlier, please do ...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>
To: <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:15 PM
Subject: Heads up: comments from CSS WG on XForms *are* coming...


> Hello XForms WG,
>
> The CSS WG has some comments on the "XForms 1.0" WD, but we won't be
> able to reach consensus on them this week. Below is a list of the
> things we have been talking about so far, but we may not retain all of
> them and we haven't decided the wording of them either.
>
> If possible, we would like to use the face-to-face next week to
> finalize the comments and take the opportunity to talk to some of you
> about them as well, if some XForms people are present on Tuesday.
>
> (It would also be a good opportunity to build some shared vision of
> how the UI of an XForm should be constructed out of XForms mark-up and
> style sheets.)
>
> We will make sure you get the final comments before Thursday, Feb 28.
> Is that OK?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> (from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JanMar/0231.html)
>
> 1) CR exit criteria too weak. Cf. the "Selectors" exit criteria:
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS3/Selectors/current/
>
>
>
> (from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JanMar/0135.html)
>
> 2) The selectMany and selectOne controls should be merged.
>
> 3) ... and should have control over minimum and maximum number of
> selected items.
>
> 4) checkbox" and "radio" style hints should be merged, since they are
> not a style, but dictated by whether min-select = max-select = 1.
>
> 5) ... or radio should not be a valid choice on selectMany and
> checkbox not a choice for selectOne
>
>
>
> (from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JanMar/0250.html)
>
> 6) HTTP GET should not be deprecated, as its semantics cannot be
> reproduced by POST.
>
> 7) Grammar error: "they" referring to a singular referent.
>
> 8) Automatic selection of UI widget based on datatype of INPUT element
> is not realistic, since datatypes can be user-defined.
>
> 9) ID attribute is missing from "common attributes"
>
>
>
>
> On behalf of the CSS WG,
>
> Bert
> --
>   Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
>   http://www.w3.org/people/bos/                              W3C/INRIA
>   bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
>   +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 13:30:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:50 GMT