W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Naming: select1 vs. singleSelect

From: Kurt George Gjerde <kurt.gjerde@intermedia.uib.no>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:57:16 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Piroumian Konstantin <KPiroumian@protek.com>
cc: "'www-forms@w3.org'" <www-forms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0208261038390.2381-100000@hermes.svf.uib.no>

On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Piroumian Konstantin wrote:
> What is the reason of using a name like 'select1' for single choice
> selection element?
> Don't you think that this kind of name is absolutely unusual in XML, XSL,
> XHTML or HTML worlds? What's wrong with 'selectOne' or
> 'singleSelect'/'multiSelect' names? Or maybe 'select-one' (using XSLT naming
> convensions)?

Absolutely. I skimmed parts of the new WD yesterday and this one really
made me wonder. It just looks wrong; selectOne or select-one is
much better. Also doesn't select1 kind of imply that there's a select2,
select3, etc...

The new <select/> (instead of selectMany) is also confusing since most
current uses of the HTML select element is for selecting a single item.

And, what's the reason for having two select elements in the first place?
Can't there just be an attribute that says how many items that can be
selected?

Best,
-Kurt.
__________
kurt george gjerde <kurt.gjerde@intermedia.uib.no>
intermedia uib, university of bergen
Received on Monday, 26 August 2002 04:58:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:51 GMT