W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Who cares of irrelevant instance data nodes?

From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:37:02 -0700
Message-ID: <E840F0B7E6189547BDB91DA8BF2228AB28C431@csmail.cardiff.com>
To: 'Jérôme Nègre' <jerome.negre@e-xmlmedia.fr>, www-forms@w3.org
>What happens if an XPath expression such as sum() is used [with
relevant="false()"]?

We haven't defined any interaction between relevant and sum(). Sum works on
the XPath level; relevant is a separate 'constraint' tacked on to the XPath
model.

Same for minOccurs/maxOccurs.

.micah

-----Original Message-----
From: Jérôme Nègre [mailto:jerome.negre@e-xmlmedia.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 5:12 AM
To: www-forms@w3.org
Subject: Who cares of irrelevant instance data nodes?


Hi,

nodes with relevant='false' are not not serialized for submission (chapter
6.1.4).

What happens if an XPath expression such as sum() is used? Should irrelevant
nodes be ignored?

Does minOccurs and maxOccurs take irrelevant nodes into account?

Thanks,
Jérôme
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 16:10:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:51 GMT