W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > November 2001

RE: Non-browser compliance

From: David E. Cleary <davec@progress.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:32:56 -0500
To: "Micah Dubinko" <MDubinko@cardiff.com>, "'Jim Wissner'" <jim@jbrix.org>, <www-forms@w3.org>
> Could you provide a "best-case-scenario" for how XForms (and XForm
> conformance) could be specified to allow both innovative
> applications (like
> yours) and regular browsers to be conforming and interoperable
> (and not just
> in words, but in practice)?

My view is that there should be a reference model that exercises most if not
all of the functionality. This would then be bound to any UI through binding
attributes. Conformance would be acheived through posting and validation of
a completed form.

I have no clue of automating this type of conformance test.

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 09:33:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:36:05 UTC