W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > July 2001

RE: <model>- declaration

From: Josef Dietl <josef@mozquito.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:04:46 +0200
Message-ID: <D0F1529EE943B3449F755CA1A40887460FC029@winserver.windomain.mozquito.com>
To: "Roman Huditsch" <r.huditsch@hico.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>
Hi Roman and all,

this was a really excellent question. Big thanks to all the colleagues
from the working group who have contributed to the following answer on
short notice. As always, please be aware that the following reflects the
current thinking of some members of the working group, but not
necessarily the consensus. As this is built on work in progress (namely
a specification in Working Draft stage), the technology described is
still subject to change. Note that your feedback can actually contribute
to such changes, even though I can't promise that we can take your
opinion into account.

To business: For the time being, let's have a look at the two simplest
examples. They correspond to very different scenarios, and depending on
where you come from you will most likely consider only one of the two
"simple".

Let us keep in mind that the goal of the model is to provide run-time
input validation to the user. There are two possible starting points:

Case 1: If you start from scratch and want to add validation features,
the simplest approach is to use the built-in datatypes of XML Schema, in
conjunction with the "XML Schema instance" mechanism. In other words,
there is no model separate from the instance, instead, the instance
itself is annotated with datatypes. Based on Roman's example, this would
look like:

<xf:instance>
	<notiz>
		<username xsi:type="xsd:string" />
		<persoenlicheNotiz xsi:type="xsd:string" />
		<datum xsi:type="xsd:date" />
		<titel xsi:type="xsd:string" />
		<text xsi:type="xsd:string" />
	</notiz>
</xf:instance>

(assuming the following namespace declarations are in force:
	xmlns:xf="http://www.w3.org/2001/06/xforms"
	xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance")

NOTE THAT because of the original choice of data model, the original
scenario is very difficult to validate (separately storing day from
month and year doesn't tell us whether the <tag>31</tag> is valid or
not... this depends on the month, and, in the case of
<tag>29</tag><monat>02</monat> even on the year). My reformulation is
easier to handle because it builds on the existing Schema datatype
"date" - don't worry, we will ultimately provide a user friendly way to
enter a date.

Anyway, if you want to know the gory details of this mechanism, please
have a
look at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#attribute-xsi:type or your
favorite text on XML Schemas.

Case 2: You start with a Schema, possibly one that someone else has
provided for you. In that case, simply write

<xf:model xl:href="(URL of Schema)" />

and be done with it. (assuming the following namespace declarations are
in force:	xmlns:xf="http://www.w3.org/2001/06/xforms"
	xmlns:xl="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink")

The instance must then conform to that Schema. But keep in mind that not
all XForms processors are required to support the full XML Schema. So
far, it is settled that for the "full" conformance profile of XForms,
both examples must work and that for the "basic" conformance profile the
above Case 1 must work. It is also clear that it will be possible to
define your  own "simple types" for XForms basic. XForms basic will not
support Schema "complex types".

Further messages will cover the grey area between these two examples
over the next few
weeks, e.g. how to define and use datatypes in XForms Basic. 

Please let us know what you think, whether these examples work in your
scenario and, most important, if they don't, what is missing.

Regards,

Josef Dietl

P.S.: the terms "simple type" and "complex type" are part of the XML
Schema terminology. Who here needs explanations in order to follow the
discussion, and who is sufficiently fluent to proceed without? Which of
the two scenarios above applies to you?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roman Huditsch [mailto:r.huditsch@hico.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:11 AM
> To: www-forms@w3.org
> Subject: <model>- declaration
> 
> 
> Good morning everybody!
> 
> Could someone please give me an concrete example of a <model>-
> declaration? I've seen so many different possibilities so far 
> that I've
> no clue any more how to declare it.
> I just want to define an element called "Tag" which should be based on
> the datatype "day" and so on. 
> Would it be possible to write:		
> 
> 			<xform:model>
> 				<xsd:simpleType name="day">
> 					<xsd:restriction
> base="xsd:gDay">
> 					</xsd:restriction>
> 				</xsd:simpleType>
> 				<xsd:simpleType name="month">
> 					<xsd:restriction
> base="xsd:gMonth">
> 					</xsd:restriction>
> 				</xsd:simpleType>
> 				<xsd:simpleType name="year">
> 					<xsd:restriction
> base="xsd:gYear">
> 					</xsd:restriction>
> 				</xsd:simpleType>
> 	</xform:model>
> 
> 
> 		<xform:instance>
> 				<notiz>
> 					<username />
> 					<persoenlicheNotiz />
> 					<datum>
> 						<tag type="day"/>
> 						<monat type="month"/>
> 						<jahr type="year"/>
> 					</datum>
> 					<titel />
> 					<text />
> 				</notiz>
> 		</xform:instance>
> 
> Or would it be better to declare it like this:
> 
> 	<model>
> 	    <day name="tag" required="true"....>
> 	    <month name="monat" required="true" ....>
> 	</model>
> 
> Yours,
> Roman
> 
> > Roman Huditsch (RH ) 
> > 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> > hico Informations- und Kommunikations-Management Gesellschaft m.b.H.
> > TechLab, Thomas A. Edison Straße 2.
> > A-7000 Eisenstadt / Austria
> > phone: +43/2682/704-61-00; fax: +43/2682/704-71-61-10
> > e-mail:support@hico.com;  r.huditsch@hico.com
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 13:04:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:49 GMT