In a message dated 11/07/01 16:27:31 GMT Daylight Time, wNema@MediaOne.net writes: > It would be nice to include a means for specifying a field as a "Required > Field". Additionally, to take it a step further, one should be able to > define a "Required-Field Mask Set" where one could define the allowable > field combination sets of which at least one must be met. For instance, on a > search screen, the user must enter one of the following: > a) zip code > b) city and state, or > c) phone number > > This requirement would fit under section 3.6. Waleed, I think that functionality is already present implicitly. If an XSD Schema datatype is restricted so that it cannot accept an empty string (or whatever) then that, I think, would work out de facto as a required field. Andrew WattReceived on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 11:38:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:49 GMT