W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > February 2001

Fw: Looking for XForms Processor

From: Dominic Cooney <coonsta@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:45:25 +1000
Message-ID: <004e01c09c4f$99beed70$5f5254d2@mobius>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominic Cooney" <coonsta@ozemail.com.au>
To: <xforms@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Looking for XForms Processor


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dominic Cooney" <coonsta@ozemail.com.au>
> To: "Beck Tibor" <tibor.beck@icl.sk>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Looking for XForms Processor
>
>
> > I have developed a small, non-conforming subset of XForms as a
server-side
> > taglib for JSP developers.
> >
> > It uses JAXP, Apache Xalan and ORO to deliver a small but useful subset
of
> > functionality. It was a university project (i.e. purely exploratory and
> not
> > intended for deployment) but I could copy it to you if you're
interested.
> >
> > Briefly, it supports:
> >
> > - string, number, boolean
> > - pattern, minLength, maxLength, minInclusive, minExclusive,
maxInclusive,
> > maxExclusive
> > - some simple syntax
> > - textbox, checkbox, exclusiveSelect, submit
> > - groupbox, caption
> >
> > But there are lots of other limitations (e.g. every UI element must be
in
> a
> > groupbox, some bugs in support for submit protocol, no dynamic
> expressions,
> > etc., etc.)
> >
> > Other developers: I've whet my appetite. Is anybody interested in trying
> to
> > do a fuller implementation with a tighter focus on conformance?
> >
> > Dominic Cooney
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Beck Tibor" <tibor.beck@icl.sk>
> > To: <www-forms@w3.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 5:50 PM
> > Subject: Looking for XForms Processor
> >
> >
> > > The XForms specification looks nice, but is there any tool already
(e.g.
> > an XForms Processor) for practical use of this specification, or the
only
> > way is to create one?
> > >
> > > Tibor Beck, ICL Slovakia.
> > >
> >
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2001 16:43:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:48 GMT