W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > May 2000

RE: Standards

From: Max Wyss <prodok@prodok.ch>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 23:00:34 +0200
Message-Id: <l03110709b53f7d29ec64@[192.168.0.15]>
To: Rob McDougall <RMcDouga@JetForm.com>
Cc: "XForms (E-mail)" <www-forms@w3.org>
Rob,

How far should XForms cover the practical issues about forms, such as
contents integrity of the form, or legal issues (can these forms be legally
binding)?



Max Wyss
PRODOK Engineering
Low Paper workflows, Smart documents, PDF forms
CH-8906 Bonstetten, Switzerland

Fax:  +41 1 700 20 37
e-mail:  mailto:prodok@prodok.ch
http://www.prodok.ch



[ Building Bridges for Information ]


______________________





>    Randy,   XForms' primary goal is to enhance the functionality of
>today's user of  HTML forms on the web. This means that it's primary
>target is the "fill"  experience. In the requirements document we list as
>future goals things like  Digital Signatures and Paper enhancements. Both
>XFDL and XFA contain  functionality that is not going to be in XForms for
>some time, if ever. As such,  you won't get the "normalized XML Form
>Standard" that you are looking for from  XForms, but you will get an ever
>richer experience with web forms. The XForms  functionality may grow over
>time to encompass all the things listed on the web  page and more, but not
>in the initial version. All the other Forms technologies  will
>interoperate in various ways with XForms.  
>As far as digital signatures goes, that won't be in version 1.0,  but I
>expect it will be a high priority in the subsequent version. Digital
>Signatures will be based on the W3C Dsig's work which includes forms
>vendors,  PKI vendors and biometric technology vendors.
> Does this answer your questions?   Rob
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2000 17:27:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:21:47 GMT